Wave Particle Duality
Key idea: Connect photon and wave models: E = hf, p = E/c = h/λ, and de Broglie wavelength λ = h/p for matter waves (A Level Physics).
Continue where you stopped
The core idea
On this page
Learning objectives
- Apply de Broglie wavelength and wave-particle evidence.
1. Definitions (Must Know)
A. Wave–particle duality
Wave–particle duality means that the same physical entity can show:
- wave behaviour (e.g. interference, diffraction),
- particle behaviour (e.g. localised detection events).
B. Photon energy and momentum
- photon energy: E = hf
- photon momentum: p = E/c = h/λ
C. de Broglie wavelength (matter waves)
For a particle with momentum p:
λ = h/p
2. Key Ideas (What Earns Marks)
- Photoelectric effect supports the particle nature of light (threshold frequency).
- Interference/diffraction supports the wave nature of light.
- Electron diffraction and single-particle interference support the wave nature of particles.
- In many questions, you use:
- E = hf for photon energy,
- p = E/c or p = h/λ for photon momentum,
- λ = h/p for matter waves.
Quantum Physics learning outcomes 19a–19e cover the evidence + the key equations above.
3. Detailed Explanations
A. Photon momentum relationship
Using f = c/λ in E = hf:
So photon momentum can be written as: p = E/c = h/λ
B. Why “cannot reveal both aspects at once” is a useful sentence
Some experiments are designed to reveal wave behaviour (interference patterns), while others reveal particle behaviour (localised detection and energy transfer events).
In exam answers, you can say:
- “The experiment reveals wave behaviour (diffraction/interference).”
- “Detection happens as discrete events (particle-like).”
4. Common Mistakes
- Mixing up photon wavelength with de Broglie wavelength (the formula looks the same, but the momentum is different).
- Using p = h/λ without checking units (use SI: m, kg, s).
5. Exam Tips
- If asked for evidence, name the phenomenon and the conclusion:
- “threshold frequency → photons”,
- “electron diffraction → matter waves”.
- If asked for a calculation, write the equation first, then substitute with units.
6. Worked Examples
Modelled example 1
Photon momentum
Problem
Study the worked solution
Convert wavelength
Method
500 nm = 5.00 × 10⁻⁷ m.Reason
The momentum relation requires SI wavelength.Working
500 × 10⁻⁹ m = 5.00 × 10⁻⁷ mApply photon momentum
Method
p = 1.33 × 10⁻²⁷ kg m s⁻¹.Reason
A photon has momentum h/λ despite having zero rest mass.Working
p = h/λ = (6.63 × 10⁻³⁴)/(500 × 10⁻⁹) = 1.33 × 10⁻²⁷ kg m s⁻¹
Guided practice 2
de Broglie wavelength of a particle
Problem
Try this before viewing the solution
Hints
Hint 1: use inverse momentum
View solution step by step
Select the matter-wave relation
Method
λ = h/p.Reason
de Broglie wavelength is determined by particle momentum.Working
λ = (6.63 × 10⁻³⁴)/(3.0 × 10⁻²⁴)Evaluate
Method
λ = 2.21 × 10⁻¹⁰ m.Reason
This is comparable to atomic spacings, so electron diffraction is feasible.Working
λ = 2.21 × 10⁻¹⁰ m
Common misconception 3
Can a finite-momentum object have zero wavelength?
Learner claim
Try this before viewing the solution
View solution step by step
Test finite momentum
Method
Apply λ = h/p with finite p.Reason
Since h is positive and non-zero, finite non-zero momentum gives a positive, non-zero wavelength.Working
An exactly zero wavelength would require p → ∞, not merely a large everyday momentum.Interpret the stationary limit
Method
Let momentum approach zero.Reason
The wavelength grows without bound as p → 0; the formula has no finite value at p = 0.Working
p → 0 ⇒ λ = h/p → ∞
Examiner practice 4
Electron wavelength from accelerating voltage
Examination question
Try this before viewing the solution
View solution step by step
Connect electrical and kinetic energy
1 markMethod
Set transferred electrical energy equal to kinetic energy.Reason
The electron starts from rest and the model neglects other transfers.Working
eV = p²/2mₑExpress momentum
1 markMethod
Rearrange for p.Reason
de Broglie wavelength is determined by momentum.Working
p = square root of (2mₑ eV)Substitute into the de Broglie relation
1 markMethod
Combine λ = h/p with the momentum expression.Reason
This avoids rounding momentum before finding wavelength.Working
λ = h/(square root of (2mₑ eV))Calculate the wavelength
1 markMethod
Obtain an atomic-scale wavelength.Reason
All values are in SI units.Working
λ = (6.63 × 10⁻³⁴)/(square root of (2(9.11 × 10⁻³¹)(1.60 × 10⁻¹⁹)(150))) = 1.00 × 10⁻¹⁰ mCheck the model
1 markMethod
Compare the kinetic energy with electron rest energy.Reason
150 eV is far below 511 keV, so relativistic corrections are negligible at this precision.Working
150 eV≪511 keV.
Self-mark with the mark scheme
Compare your response with each mark point. Select a point only when your response contains that evidence.
Self-mark the energy relation, momentum, de Broglie substitution, result and model check.
Challenge 5
Speed from de Broglie wavelength
Independent transfer
Try this before viewing the solution
Hints
Hint 1: reverse the chain
View solution step by step
Infer momentum
Method
p = 6.63 × 10⁻²⁴ kg m s⁻¹.Reason
Rearrange the de Broglie relation as p = h/λ.Working
p = (6.63 × 10⁻³⁴)/(1.0 × 10⁻¹⁰) = 6.63 × 10⁻²⁴ kg m s⁻¹Infer speed
Method
v = 7.3 × 10⁶ m s⁻¹.Reason
For the stated non-relativistic model, v = p/mₑ.Working
v = (6.63 × 10⁻²⁴)/(9.11 × 10⁻³¹) = 7.28 × 10⁶ m s⁻¹
7. Mind Stretchers
Mind stretcher 1: When is diffraction more obvious?Extension
Explain why slower particles tend to show more obvious diffraction effects.
Show Answer
Slower particles have smaller momentum p.
Since λ = h/p, smaller p gives larger wavelength, and diffraction becomes more significant when the wavelength is comparable to the aperture/spacing.
Mind stretcher 2: Why don’t we see wave behaviour for everyday objects?Extension
Explain why wave effects are not obvious for a 0.10 kg ball moving at 10 m s⁻¹.
Show Answer
Its momentum is p = mv = 0.10 × 10 = 1.0 kg m s⁻¹, so: λ = h/p ≈ (6.63 × 10⁻³⁴)/1.0 = 6.6 × 10⁻³⁴ m
This wavelength is unimaginably smaller than any slit/atomic spacing, so diffraction/interference effects are negligible and unobservable.
8. Optional (Enrichment)
A. “Complementarity” wording
Some texts call the “can’t reveal both aspects in one setup” idea complementarity. You do not need that word for most exam questions; describing the observation and conclusion is enough.
Continue with the next resource in this course.
Course and syllabus information
- Course
- GCE A-Level H2 Physics
- Edition
- GCE A-Level H2 Physics 2027