How a temperature gradient develops
Explain how a temperature gradient develops over time and approaches a linear steady state in a uniform bar.
Offline pages
Saved on this device only. Connect at least once every 30 days to confirm Premium. Sign-out or a change of account removes saved copies.
On this page
You stopped at:
ContinueThis page gives the UY1 working model/result for Build up of temperature gradient. You reuse it when you turn thermal intuition into calculable models (energy balances, process reasoning, and kinetic/statistical links), with careful sign/units checks.
- Module path: Thermodynamics (UY1)
- Full routing: UY1 assessment map
- Math toolkit: Mathematics for undergraduate physics
At a glance
- Prerequisites: Fourier’s law, heat capacity, conservation of energy.
- Outcomes: describe transient temperature evolution toward steady state.
- Key result: temperature field evolves by a diffusion equation before becoming linear at steady state.
- Common trap: assuming linear profile appears immediately after boundary temperatures are imposed.
Setup
Uniform rod of length L, area A, density ρ, specific heat c, conductivity k.
- Initial condition: T(x,0) = T₀.
- Boundary conditions: left end fixed at Tₕ, right end fixed at Tc (Tₕ > Tc).
- Lateral surface insulated.
Physical interpretation:
- The heat equation is a diffusion law: temperature “spreads” in time the way concentration spreads in diffusion.
- Thermal diffusivity
α = k/(ρ c)measures how fast a material equalizes temperature: large k helps spread heat, while large ρ c means the material stores lots of energy per kelvin (slower response).
Core derivation / explanation
Take a small slice dx. Energy balance:
Using Fourier law Q dot = -kA ∂ T/∂ x and Taylor expansion,
Hence heat equation:
At steady state, ∂ T/∂ t = 0, so
which is linear between boundaries.
Units check:
Physical sanity check:
- Larger α means faster approach to steady state.
- If Tₕ = Tc, gradient vanishes and the rod becomes uniform in temperature.
- The timescale τ∼ L²/α is an order-of-magnitude estimate. Exact solutions depend on boundary conditions and geometry. - Many real setups impose boundary temperatures through convection, not perfectly fixed end temperatures (see UY1: convection and UY1: Convective Heat Transfer).
Estimating the response time
Worked example 1
Rod response time
Problem
Show full solution
Use the diffusion length scale
Method
Estimate τ from L²/α.Reason
Diffusion spreads over a distance proportional to the square root of elapsed time, so the time grows as the length squared.Working
Answer
τ∼L²/α = 0.20²/(1.0 × 10⁻⁵) = 4.0 × 10³ s.Interpret the estimate
Working
Answer
τ∼4.0 × 10³ s ≈ 1.1 h. This is a characteristic diffusion timescale, not an exact time to reach steady state; the numerical factor depends on the boundaries and the chosen settling criterion.
Practice set
Check your understanding 1
For the same material and boundary conditions, how does the diffusion timescale change when the rod length doubles?
Show hint
Show answer
Check your understanding 2
What mathematical condition on T(x,t) defines a steady temperature field?
Show hint
Show answer
Check your understanding 3
A uniform rod has insulated sides, fixed end temperatures and no internal heat source. Why can its temperature profile be curved during the transient but linear at steady state?
Show hint
Show answer
Summary + next steps
- Temperature gradients are formed dynamically, not instantaneously.
- Transient conduction is governed by a diffusion PDE.
- Linear profile appears only after steady state is reached in uniform 1D conduction.
Next steps:
- Use steady gradients in layered systems at UY1: thermal conduction through a compound slab.
- Revisit the steady-state constitutive law used inside the derivation: UY1: conduction.
Spotted an error? Report a correction
Syllabus and review details
No official syllabus alignment is listed for this lesson.