A Particle in a Well of Finite Height
Key idea: H3 Quantum Mechanics: the finite square well — exponential decay outside the well, boundary matching, and why tunnelling is possible.
Continue where you stopped
The core idea
On this page
Learning objectives
- Use state functions, boundary conditions, stationary states, and measurement to analyse introductory quantum systems.
In an infinite well, the wavefunction is strictly zero outside the well. Real wells are finite: if the particle’s energy is below the wall height, the wavefunction decays outside the well but is not zero. This is evanescent penetration; if the forbidden region has finite width and another allowed region lies beyond it, the same mathematics permits tunnelling transmission.
1. Finite-square-well model
We use the common “finite square well” model:
- V(x) = 0 for 0 < x < L
- V(x) = V₀ for x ≤ 0 and x ≥ L
For a bound state, the particle has:
E < V₀
The finite-well schematic below shows the key bound-state signature: oscillatory ψ(x) inside the well with exponential tails outside.
2. Solutions in each region
Start from the time-independent Schrödinger equation:
-(ħ²/2m)d²ψ/dx² + Vψ = Eψ
Region II (inside the well, 0 < x < L)
Here V = 0, so:
d²ψ/dx² = -k²ψ where k² = 2mE/ħ²
General solution:
ψ_II(x) = A sin(kx) + B cos(kx)
Regions I and III (outside the well)
Here V = V₀ and for a bound state E < V₀, so:
d²ψ/dx² = κ²ψ where κ² = (2m(V₀-E))/ħ²
General solution:
ψ(x) = Ce^(κ x) + De^(-κ x)
Physical acceptability requires ψ → 0 far from the well:
- Region I (x < 0): discard e^(-κ x) (it blows up as x → -∞), so ψ_I(x) = F e^(κ x)
- Region III (x > L): discard e^(+κ x) (it blows up as x → + ∞), so ψ_III(x) = G e^(-κ x)
So the wavefunction is non-zero outside the well but decays exponentially.
3. Boundary conditions and quantisation
At a finite potential step, both ψ and its first derivative must be continuous:
- at x = 0: ψ_I = ψ_II and dψ_I/dx = dψ_II/dx
- at x = L: ψ_II = ψ_III and dψ_II/dx = dψ_III/dx
These conditions do not force ψ to be zero at the walls. Instead, they select only certain values of E that make the three-region solution “fit” smoothly, so the bound-state energies are still discrete.
What changes compared to the infinite well?
- Infinite well: boundary conditions are ψ(0) = ψ(L) = 0 and ψ = 0 outside. - Finite well: ψ is continuous at the walls and “leaks” outside with an exponential tail.
4. Penetration depth and tunnelling
Outside the well, ψ ∝ e^(-κ x), so the probability density falls like:
|ψ|² ∝ e^(-2κ x)
A common way to describe how far the wavefunction penetrates is the penetration depth:
δ = 1/κ
Larger V₀ (or smaller E) makes κ larger, so the tail decays faster and the finite well approaches the infinite-well limit.
A non-zero tail outside a bound well does not by itself describe a particle escaping to infinity. Tunnelling transmission refers to a finite barrier with a classically allowed region on its far side.
5. Common traps
- Saying “the particle cannot be outside because E < V₀” (quantum mechanically it can, with small probability).
- Using sinusoidal solutions outside the well for E < V₀ (they should be exponential).
- Forgetting the continuity of both ψ and dψ/dx at boundaries.
- Confusing ψ with |ψ|².
6. Quick check
A. For a bound state (E < V₀), what is the qualitative form of the wavefunction outside the well?
Answer
Exponential decay, e.g. ψ ∝ e^(-κ x).
B. If V₀ increases while E stays the same, what happens to the tunnelling tail?
Answer
κ = square root of (2m(V₀-E))/ħ increases, so the wavefunction decays faster and the tail becomes shorter.
Continue with the next resource in this course.
Course and syllabus information
- Course
- Advanced Physics
- Edition
- Advanced Physics