Allowed Energy States of a Trapped Particle
Key idea: Derive infinite-well energy levels and distinguish fixed energy from the two possible momentum outcomes of a standing state.
Continue where you stopped
The core idea
On this page
Learning objectives
- Use state functions, boundary conditions, stationary states, and measurement to analyse introductory quantum systems.
In the infinite square well (“particle in a box”), boundary conditions force a standing wave. This selects discrete wavelengths and energies, together with discrete possible momentum magnitudes.
1. Allowed momentum outcomes
From the standing-wave condition:
L = nλₙ/2 (n = 1,2,3,…)
so
λₙ = 2L/n
Using de Broglie’s relation |p| = h/λ gives the magnitude
|pₙ| = h/λₙ = nh/2L = nπħ/L.
The energy eigenfunction is a standing wave, equivalent to equal-amplitude travelling waves with momenta + pₙ and -pₙ. Therefore ⟨p⟩ = 0, but a momentum measurement returns either sign and ⟨p²⟩ = pₙ².
2. Quantised energy
Inside the box, V(x) = 0, so total energy equals kinetic energy:
E = K = p²/2m
Substitute p = pₙ:
Eₙ = pₙ²/2m = n²h²/8mL² = n²π²ħ²/2mL²
Key consequence: Eₙ ∝ n², so the spacing between levels increases with n.
3. Ground-state energy
- Quantised energy: the particle can only have discrete energies labelled by the quantum number n.
- Ground state: n = 1, so E₁ = h²/8mL² = π²ħ²/2mL² A confined particle cannot be “at rest” with E = 0.
Why n = 0 is not allowed
Boundary-condition viewpoint (most direct)
The walls require ψ(0) = ψ(L) = 0. The allowed solutions inside the box are standing waves, which start at n = 1. The “n = 0 solution” corresponds to ψ = 0 everywhere (no particle).
Uncertainty-principle intuition (good for explanations)
If a particle is confined to a region of size Δ x ∼ L, then the uncertainty principle implies a non-zero momentum spread: Δ p ≳ ħ/2L So the kinetic energy cannot be exactly zero. This argument does not give the exact numerical factor for E₁, but it correctly predicts the key idea: confinement forces a non-zero minimum energy that scales like 1/L².
Limiting case: L → ∞
As L increases, E₁ ∝ 1/L² decreases and the level spacing shrinks. In the limit L → ∞, the particle becomes effectively free and the energy becomes continuous (including E = 0).
4. Common traps
- Writing n = 0 as the ground state (ground state is n = 1).
- Mixing up “half-wavelengths in the box” (L = nλ/2) with “full wavelengths” (L = nλ).
- Confusing ψ with |ψ|² (probability density).
- Forgetting to state the reason for quantisation: boundary conditions at the walls.
- Saying the standing state has one definite signed momentum pₙ.
6. Worked Examples
Modelled example 1
Electron in a 1.0 nm box
Problem
Study the worked solution
Calculate the ground state
Method
E₁ = 6.02 × 10⁻²⁰ J = 0.376 eV.Reason
The lowest allowed state is n = 1, not n = 0.Working
E₁ = h²/8mₑL² = 6.02 × 10⁻²⁰ J = 0.376 eVScale to the third level
Method
E₃ = 3.38 eV.Reason
Eₙ = n²E₁, so the third level is nine times the ground-state energy.Working
E₃ = 9E₁ = 3.38 eV
7. Quick check
Mind stretcher 1: Energy-level scaling checkExtension
A. What is E₂/E₁?
Answer
Since Eₙ ∝ n², E₂/E₁ = 4.
B. If the box length doubles, what happens to E₁?
Answer
E₁ ∝ 1/L², so doubling L makes E₁ four times smaller.
Continue with the next resource in this course.
Course and syllabus information
- Course
- Advanced Physics
- Edition
- Advanced Physics