Frames of reference
Compare inertial and non-inertial frames, apply Galilean transformations and use the centre-of-mass frame to simplify collisions.
Offline pages
Saved on this device only. Connect at least once every 30 days to confirm Premium. Sign-out or a change of account removes saved copies.
Before you begin
A frame of reference is the set of axes and the clock an observer uses to give every event a position and a time. The lessons start by telling inertial frames from accelerating ones, then use the Galilean transformation to move between frames, and finish by solving one-dimensional collisions in the centre-of-mass (COM) frame.
Be comfortable with: Newton’s laws and momentum conservation in collisions, using signed velocities.
Learning goals
- State that a frame of reference is a set of coordinates for locating the positions and times of events
- Explain that Newton's laws of motion hold in every inertial frame of reference
- Recall and use the Galilean transformation to relate observations in different inertial frames
- Explain that the centre-of-mass (zero-momentum) frame is the inertial frame in which a system's total momentum is zero
- Solve one-dimensional collisions using velocities relative to the centre of mass
Syllabus statements covered
- state that a frame of reference is a set of coordinates that can be used to determine positions and times of events in that frame
- show an understanding that Newton’s laws of motion are obeyed in all inertial frames of reference
- recall and apply the Galilean transformation equations to solve problems relating observations in different inertial frames of reference
- show an understanding that the centre of mass frame (or zero momentum frame) is the inertial frame in which the total linear momentum of the system is zero
- solve one-dimensional collision problems by considering velocities relative to the centre of mass of the system (i.e. in the zero-momentum frame)
Lessons
Work through them in order.
- Inertial and non-inertial framesUse the force-free-particle test to classify frames and explain why uniformly moving observers agree on Newton’s laws.
- Galilean transformationsTransform positions and signed velocities between parallel, non-rotating inertial frames in classical mechanics.
- The centre-of-mass frameFind the zero-momentum frame and check when constant COM velocity makes that frame inertial.
- One-dimensional collisions in the centre-of-mass frameTransform to the isolated system’s COM frame, apply the collision rule and transform the velocities back.
Practise and check
Or choose
Topic reference
Quick reference
| Idea | Relation | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Galilean transformation | x' = x-ut, t' = t | S' moves at + u along x relative to S |
| velocity | v'ₓ = vₓ-u | speeds much less than c |
| acceleration | a'ₓ = aₓ | the same in all inertial frames |
| fictitious force in a frame accelerating at vector af | vector F_fict = -m vector af | not a physical interaction |
| COM velocity | vector V_cm = (∑ mᵢ vector vᵢ)/(∑ mᵢ) | total momentum is zero in the COM frame |
| elastic collision, COM frame | v'₁ = -u'₁, v'₂ = -u'₂ | each velocity reverses |
| objects that stick, COM frame | v' = 0 | lab velocity = V_cm |
Core knowledge to remember
- In an inertial frame, a particle with no resultant force stays at rest or moves at constant velocity, and Newton’s laws hold in their usual form.
- Any frame moving at constant velocity, with non-rotating axes, relative to an inertial frame is also inertial. No inertial frame is preferred.
- An accelerating or rotating frame is non-inertial. Using F = ma there needs fictitious forces, which come from the frame’s acceleration.
- Inertial observers disagree about positions, velocities and the shapes of paths, but agree about accelerations and forces.
- The COM frame of an isolated system is inertial and has zero total momentum, before and after a collision.
- To solve a collision in the COM frame: transform the velocities, apply the collision rule, then transform back to the lab.
Common mistakes
- Writing x' = x + ut because the direction in which S' moves was never stated.
- Using speeds instead of signed velocities to find V_cm.
- Treating an accelerating frame as inertial.
- Confusing the COM frame with one object’s rest frame.
- Giving COM-frame velocities when the question asks for lab-frame velocities.
- Comparing kinetic energies measured in different frames.